Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步? - 星際爭霸戰

By Hardy
at 2007-12-24T14:30
at 2007-12-24T14:30
Table of Contents
※ 引述《pheliona (就這樣)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《[email protected] (char)》之銘言:
: : 請問各位會覺得在Star Trek與Star War 中,
: : 哪一個世界的科技比較進步?
: 看了半天ST與SW,感覺雷射槍類武器是ST較強,
聯邦的光砲最多 7 megatons/秒
Wars 的 turbolaser 一發 200 gigatons
沒得比
: 但艦隊而言感覺ST的星聯星艦,
: 較無法檔的住SW帝國的艦隊群,
: 如果說是borg 方塊就感覺兩者相較勁.
如果數十到上百艘星艦可以在 FC 把一顆博格方塊打成重傷,
一台 ISD 不需多少力氣便能把同一方塊打爆
--
People assume that time is a strict progression Ⅱ
of cause to effect. But actually, from a non- ▅█▅
linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like 田田▌
a big ball of wibbly-wobbly...timey-wimey... ■■▌
stuff. ■■▌
_ ■■ _
--
: ※ 引述《[email protected] (char)》之銘言:
: : 請問各位會覺得在Star Trek與Star War 中,
: : 哪一個世界的科技比較進步?
: 看了半天ST與SW,感覺雷射槍類武器是ST較強,
聯邦的光砲最多 7 megatons/秒
Wars 的 turbolaser 一發 200 gigatons
沒得比
: 但艦隊而言感覺ST的星聯星艦,
: 較無法檔的住SW帝國的艦隊群,
: 如果說是borg 方塊就感覺兩者相較勁.
如果數十到上百艘星艦可以在 FC 把一顆博格方塊打成重傷,
一台 ISD 不需多少力氣便能把同一方塊打爆
--
People assume that time is a strict progression Ⅱ
of cause to effect. But actually, from a non- ▅█▅
linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like 田田▌
a big ball of wibbly-wobbly...timey-wimey... ■■▌
stuff. ■■▌
_ ■■ _
--
Tags:
星際爭霸戰
All Comments

By Hardy
at 2007-12-26T21:37
at 2007-12-26T21:37

By Daph Bay
at 2007-12-31T21:24
at 2007-12-31T21:24

By Anonymous
at 2008-01-01T10:06
at 2008-01-01T10:06

By Elvira
at 2008-01-03T08:11
at 2008-01-03T08:11

By Puput
at 2008-01-04T03:02
at 2008-01-04T03:02
Related Posts
Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步?

By Donna
at 2007-12-24T12:09
at 2007-12-24T12:09
如果是你,第十一集電影版.........

By Oscar
at 2007-12-23T23:51
at 2007-12-23T23:51
Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步?

By Frederic
at 2007-12-23T22:07
at 2007-12-23T22:07
Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步?

By Tracy
at 2007-12-23T20:48
at 2007-12-23T20:48
Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步?

By Skylar Davis
at 2007-12-23T15:15
at 2007-12-23T15:15