The Daily Beast 這兩天訪談了 Christopher Nolan
裡面有提到關於國內外大家討論得沸沸揚揚的科學問題、漏洞等等
http://thebea.st/1GJtN5i
挑了其中相關的翻了一下，裡面還有其他訪問，關於霍華休斯傳的事情等等
感謝 qn123456 協助 XD
附上原文，如果有哪裡翻錯的話麻煩推文說一聲
People online have been attempting to poke holes in the science of
Interstellar. Do you find that literalness a bit silly? This is a movie, after
all.
To be honest, I haven’t read whatever holes people are trying to poke so I
can speak to the validity of it. My films are always held to a weirdly high
standard for those issues that isn’t applied to everybody else’s films—
which I’m fine with. People are always accusing my films of having plot
holes, and I’m very aware of the plot holes in my films and very aware of
when people spot them, but they generally don’t. But what were some science
issues people had with the film? That was Kip’s domain.
老實說，我還沒讀過那些大家所試著找出來，打算讓我驗證真實與否的漏洞。我的電影
總是會有著其他電影沒有的高標準，不過我對此沒有意見，人們總是指責我的電影有著
漏洞，但是通常來說並沒有，我很注意我電影中的漏洞，而當人們發現的時候我也非常
注意。
One thing I see being brought up is the time dilation on the planet that they
land, where one hour equals seven years (or a factor of 60,000), and to get
that time dilation you’d have to be literally skimming the surface of the
black hole.
Like “a basketball on the rim,” which is a phrase we use! That’s
completely accurate, so there’s no hole there at all. Those issues are all
buttoned-up, and Kip has a book on the science of the film about what’s
real, and what’s speculation—because much of it is, of course, speculation.
There have been a bunch of knee-jerk tweets by people who’ve only seen the
film once, but to really take on the science of the film, you’re going to
need to sit down with the film for a bit and probably also read Kip’s book.
I know where we cheated in the way you have to cheat in movies, and I’ve
made Kip aware of those things.
就像是「籃球懸在籃框上一般」，這是我們使用的詞彙，這是正確無誤的，所以這個地方
是沒有漏洞的。這些問題已經搞定了，Kip 有一本關於電影中的科學哪邊是真實的，哪裡
又是推測的書，因為其中大多數，當然都是推測的。
現在有不少由那些只看過一次電影的人發的直覺性 tweets，但是如果你要認真探討片中
的科學，你需要坐著看電影一會兒，或許同時讀一下 Kip 的書。
我知道有哪些地方是需要在電影中作弊的，而我有請 Kip 注意這點。
Kip 的書 - 《The Science of Interstellar》
--
裡面有提到關於國內外大家討論得沸沸揚揚的科學問題、漏洞等等
http://thebea.st/1GJtN5i
挑了其中相關的翻了一下，裡面還有其他訪問，關於霍華休斯傳的事情等等
感謝 qn123456 協助 XD
附上原文，如果有哪裡翻錯的話麻煩推文說一聲
People online have been attempting to poke holes in the science of
Interstellar. Do you find that literalness a bit silly? This is a movie, after
all.
To be honest, I haven’t read whatever holes people are trying to poke so I
can speak to the validity of it. My films are always held to a weirdly high
standard for those issues that isn’t applied to everybody else’s films—
which I’m fine with. People are always accusing my films of having plot
holes, and I’m very aware of the plot holes in my films and very aware of
when people spot them, but they generally don’t. But what were some science
issues people had with the film? That was Kip’s domain.
老實說，我還沒讀過那些大家所試著找出來，打算讓我驗證真實與否的漏洞。我的電影
總是會有著其他電影沒有的高標準，不過我對此沒有意見，人們總是指責我的電影有著
漏洞，但是通常來說並沒有，我很注意我電影中的漏洞，而當人們發現的時候我也非常
注意。
One thing I see being brought up is the time dilation on the planet that they
land, where one hour equals seven years (or a factor of 60,000), and to get
that time dilation you’d have to be literally skimming the surface of the
black hole.
Like “a basketball on the rim,” which is a phrase we use! That’s
completely accurate, so there’s no hole there at all. Those issues are all
buttoned-up, and Kip has a book on the science of the film about what’s
real, and what’s speculation—because much of it is, of course, speculation.
There have been a bunch of knee-jerk tweets by people who’ve only seen the
film once, but to really take on the science of the film, you’re going to
need to sit down with the film for a bit and probably also read Kip’s book.
I know where we cheated in the way you have to cheat in movies, and I’ve
made Kip aware of those things.
就像是「籃球懸在籃框上一般」，這是我們使用的詞彙，這是正確無誤的，所以這個地方
是沒有漏洞的。這些問題已經搞定了，Kip 有一本關於電影中的科學哪邊是真實的，哪裡
又是推測的書，因為其中大多數，當然都是推測的。
現在有不少由那些只看過一次電影的人發的直覺性 tweets，但是如果你要認真探討片中
的科學，你需要坐著看電影一會兒，或許同時讀一下 Kip 的書。
我知道有哪些地方是需要在電影中作弊的，而我有請 Kip 注意這點。
Kip 的書 - 《The Science of Interstellar》
--
All Comments