火盃的考驗:冗長的魔幻文藝 - 電影

By Dorothy
at 2005-11-20T02:36
at 2005-11-20T02:36
Table of Contents
四場婚禮與一場葬禮,查爾斯、菲歐娜、馬修與凱莉的愛情遊戲;四段死鬥與一刻
哀悼,花兒、喀浪、西追與波特的魔幻較勁。
十年前,麥克紐威爾在英國的婚、喪禮間巧妙地玩弄了男女間的耳語和曖昧,如今
,霍格華茲的大廳、走道與競技場之間,少了機智俏皮的日常幽默,多了華麗壯闊
的動畫特效,唯有英式喜劇的節奏感依舊清晰可見。
在理當慘烈魄人的三巫鬥法之際,如此文藝步調所堆疊出的無力感,遠遠地超過了
懷舊的歡欣。魔法、愛情、陰謀、決鬥,稍加煽動即可觸動人心的豐富元素,如今
被等同於多線情愛的鬆散敘事,中間安插著不甚完整的冒險競技,看得出紐威爾盡
力在冒險與愛情間取得平衡,然而魔幻之處描繪草率、氣弱力乏,愛情之段則暗示
頻撒、刻畫不足。
坦白來說,本片編導就是缺乏炒作氣氛的本領,其專擅的淡寫式言情卻不是本片的
賣點,於是開場歡聲雷動的世界盃魁地奇在喀浪出場後嘎然而止,世界首席搜捕手
的本事永遠停留在傳說中;有時間讓開場砲在鄧布利多跟前出糗耍笨,或賣弄魔法
世界裡的女八卦狗仔,卻沒心神好好展現三校鬥士的拿手本事,當真以為一億四千
萬可純粹耍弄眉來眼去?
鬥龍奪球、涉水救友、迷宮搜秘,三項任務獨立出來都是一部巨片,特效水準夠、
場面規模足,然而回頭重溫【火焰末日】、【水深火熱】、【失落的世界】等片,
可參考的前車之鑑多如牛毛,本片就是一片都比不上,約可滿足書迷夢幻成真的渴
望,但以奇幻歷險的水平來看,卻僅有及格邊緣,喀浪和花兒只有剛進場時勉有發
揮,然而在保加利亞的跟斗與法國的扭臀作態之後,紐威爾到底把此二勁敵該有的
戲份遺落在哪兒?
至於張秋、哈利、西追或妙麗、喀浪、榮恩之間的情愫競合,在如此篇幅中只提點
出此般的描寫,輕描僅是禮貌性的含蓄,膚淺才是坦蕩蕩的直言,【魔戒二部曲】
幾個分鏡之內就帶出伊歐玟困於女身與單戀亞拉岡的複雜情緒,時限不是藉口、編
導的責任難以推卻,刪減次要枝節本來就是製作群的使命,有餘裕關照無謂的慢調
訕笑,不如在情場與競技場的真正主角身上多加著墨。
所以,我們沒機會一睹花兒、喀浪與西追惡鬥巨龍的驚險,看不清花兒如何在水底
慘遇險著,更搞不懂迷宮中所謂「各自內心最深之孔懼」到底為何,該有的陣仗本
片一個不缺,然而空有華麗的排場、沒有揮灑的戲碼,美侖美奐的舞台上閃著空洞
虛無的霓虹燈,演員們登場亮相片刻便倉皇滾下場,要怎樣不懷疑編導的腦袋空轉
失靈?
至於此系列電影慣有的結局反高潮,即使祭出佛地魔本尊也沒有多少改善。
然而行至片尾,我早已心灰意冷加上尿急,撐過了被蓋台的魁地奇、對手嚴重缺席
的三巫鬥法,無聊的最終對決算什麼?據說原著為全系列最精彩的佳構,電影裡的
排頭也確實透露著如此的野心,然而宣傳幾近完美的本片,不過達到預告片震撼水
準的六成,略優於平板單調的前兩集,卻搆不上敘事高明的第三集。艱困之時即將
到來?此言不只是送給哈利,編導群自個兒也該好好反省呢。
--
文字是迷途者在黑森林中唯一的慰藉。
我的網誌:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/woosean
--
哀悼,花兒、喀浪、西追與波特的魔幻較勁。
十年前,麥克紐威爾在英國的婚、喪禮間巧妙地玩弄了男女間的耳語和曖昧,如今
,霍格華茲的大廳、走道與競技場之間,少了機智俏皮的日常幽默,多了華麗壯闊
的動畫特效,唯有英式喜劇的節奏感依舊清晰可見。
在理當慘烈魄人的三巫鬥法之際,如此文藝步調所堆疊出的無力感,遠遠地超過了
懷舊的歡欣。魔法、愛情、陰謀、決鬥,稍加煽動即可觸動人心的豐富元素,如今
被等同於多線情愛的鬆散敘事,中間安插著不甚完整的冒險競技,看得出紐威爾盡
力在冒險與愛情間取得平衡,然而魔幻之處描繪草率、氣弱力乏,愛情之段則暗示
頻撒、刻畫不足。
坦白來說,本片編導就是缺乏炒作氣氛的本領,其專擅的淡寫式言情卻不是本片的
賣點,於是開場歡聲雷動的世界盃魁地奇在喀浪出場後嘎然而止,世界首席搜捕手
的本事永遠停留在傳說中;有時間讓開場砲在鄧布利多跟前出糗耍笨,或賣弄魔法
世界裡的女八卦狗仔,卻沒心神好好展現三校鬥士的拿手本事,當真以為一億四千
萬可純粹耍弄眉來眼去?
鬥龍奪球、涉水救友、迷宮搜秘,三項任務獨立出來都是一部巨片,特效水準夠、
場面規模足,然而回頭重溫【火焰末日】、【水深火熱】、【失落的世界】等片,
可參考的前車之鑑多如牛毛,本片就是一片都比不上,約可滿足書迷夢幻成真的渴
望,但以奇幻歷險的水平來看,卻僅有及格邊緣,喀浪和花兒只有剛進場時勉有發
揮,然而在保加利亞的跟斗與法國的扭臀作態之後,紐威爾到底把此二勁敵該有的
戲份遺落在哪兒?
至於張秋、哈利、西追或妙麗、喀浪、榮恩之間的情愫競合,在如此篇幅中只提點
出此般的描寫,輕描僅是禮貌性的含蓄,膚淺才是坦蕩蕩的直言,【魔戒二部曲】
幾個分鏡之內就帶出伊歐玟困於女身與單戀亞拉岡的複雜情緒,時限不是藉口、編
導的責任難以推卻,刪減次要枝節本來就是製作群的使命,有餘裕關照無謂的慢調
訕笑,不如在情場與競技場的真正主角身上多加著墨。
所以,我們沒機會一睹花兒、喀浪與西追惡鬥巨龍的驚險,看不清花兒如何在水底
慘遇險著,更搞不懂迷宮中所謂「各自內心最深之孔懼」到底為何,該有的陣仗本
片一個不缺,然而空有華麗的排場、沒有揮灑的戲碼,美侖美奐的舞台上閃著空洞
虛無的霓虹燈,演員們登場亮相片刻便倉皇滾下場,要怎樣不懷疑編導的腦袋空轉
失靈?
至於此系列電影慣有的結局反高潮,即使祭出佛地魔本尊也沒有多少改善。
然而行至片尾,我早已心灰意冷加上尿急,撐過了被蓋台的魁地奇、對手嚴重缺席
的三巫鬥法,無聊的最終對決算什麼?據說原著為全系列最精彩的佳構,電影裡的
排頭也確實透露著如此的野心,然而宣傳幾近完美的本片,不過達到預告片震撼水
準的六成,略優於平板單調的前兩集,卻搆不上敘事高明的第三集。艱困之時即將
到來?此言不只是送給哈利,編導群自個兒也該好好反省呢。
--
文字是迷途者在黑森林中唯一的慰藉。
我的網誌:http://www.wretch.cc/blog/woosean
--
All Comments

By Eden
at 2005-11-23T19:32
at 2005-11-23T19:32

By Bethany
at 2005-11-27T00:43
at 2005-11-27T00:43

By Rae
at 2005-11-29T16:48
at 2005-11-29T16:48

By Carol
at 2005-12-02T02:16
at 2005-12-02T02:16

By Edwina
at 2005-12-05T16:25
at 2005-12-05T16:25

By Jacky
at 2005-12-06T19:52
at 2005-12-06T19:52

By Audriana
at 2005-12-09T08:46
at 2005-12-09T08:46

By James
at 2005-12-10T20:47
at 2005-12-10T20:47

By Audriana
at 2005-12-11T05:30
at 2005-12-11T05:30

By Isla
at 2005-12-14T15:26
at 2005-12-14T15:26

By Vanessa
at 2005-12-19T13:58
at 2005-12-19T13:58

By Quintina
at 2005-12-23T11:49
at 2005-12-23T11:49

By Belly
at 2005-12-24T14:40
at 2005-12-24T14:40

By Oscar
at 2005-12-25T16:59
at 2005-12-25T16:59

By Puput
at 2005-12-25T18:26
at 2005-12-25T18:26

By Necoo
at 2005-12-29T07:01
at 2005-12-29T07:01

By Doris
at 2005-12-31T10:08
at 2005-12-31T10:08

By Ophelia
at 2006-01-04T15:34
at 2006-01-04T15:34

By Lily
at 2006-01-07T05:56
at 2006-01-07T05:56

By Andrew
at 2006-01-12T02:05
at 2006-01-12T02:05

By Puput
at 2006-01-15T03:09
at 2006-01-15T03:09

By Connor
at 2006-01-18T00:48
at 2006-01-18T00:48

By Bennie
at 2006-01-22T05:43
at 2006-01-22T05:43

By William
at 2006-01-23T23:44
at 2006-01-23T23:44

By Irma
at 2006-01-27T11:49
at 2006-01-27T11:49

By Daniel
at 2006-01-27T20:06
at 2006-01-27T20:06

By Andy
at 2006-01-30T16:13
at 2006-01-30T16:13

By Cara
at 2006-02-02T18:25
at 2006-02-02T18:25

By Dorothy
at 2006-02-05T15:56
at 2006-02-05T15:56

By Audriana
at 2006-02-10T10:41
at 2006-02-10T10:41

By Hedy
at 2006-02-11T19:16
at 2006-02-11T19:16

By Ida
at 2006-02-15T13:54
at 2006-02-15T13:54

By Rebecca
at 2006-02-19T09:45
at 2006-02-19T09:45

By Bethany
at 2006-02-20T10:12
at 2006-02-20T10:12

By Bethany
at 2006-02-21T20:10
at 2006-02-21T20:10

By Agnes
at 2006-02-23T17:57
at 2006-02-23T17:57

By Poppy
at 2006-02-26T01:37
at 2006-02-26T01:37

By Genevieve
at 2006-03-02T00:18
at 2006-03-02T00:18

By Poppy
at 2006-03-04T21:32
at 2006-03-04T21:32

By Hardy
at 2006-03-06T11:53
at 2006-03-06T11:53

By Zenobia
at 2006-03-06T13:50
at 2006-03-06T13:50

By Barb Cronin
at 2006-03-10T15:04
at 2006-03-10T15:04

By Liam
at 2006-03-13T13:18
at 2006-03-13T13:18

By Vanessa
at 2006-03-14T20:11
at 2006-03-14T20:11

By Frederica
at 2006-03-15T19:17
at 2006-03-15T19:17

By Frederic
at 2006-03-17T08:41
at 2006-03-17T08:41

By Franklin
at 2006-03-19T12:40
at 2006-03-19T12:40

By Isla
at 2006-03-19T22:54
at 2006-03-19T22:54

By Anonymous
at 2006-03-21T14:47
at 2006-03-21T14:47

By Vanessa
at 2006-03-26T14:02
at 2006-03-26T14:02

By Kristin
at 2006-03-31T13:54
at 2006-03-31T13:54

By William
at 2006-04-05T01:29
at 2006-04-05T01:29

By Yedda
at 2006-04-09T22:32
at 2006-04-09T22:32

By Andrew
at 2006-04-10T01:35
at 2006-04-10T01:35

By Xanthe
at 2006-04-14T03:12
at 2006-04-14T03:12

By Bennie
at 2006-04-18T16:36
at 2006-04-18T16:36

By Gary
at 2006-04-23T02:40
at 2006-04-23T02:40

By Rae
at 2006-04-27T02:10
at 2006-04-27T02:10

By Brianna
at 2006-04-27T07:18
at 2006-04-27T07:18

By Suhail Hany
at 2006-04-28T09:00
at 2006-04-28T09:00

By Tracy
at 2006-05-01T19:09
at 2006-05-01T19:09

By Rebecca
at 2006-05-01T22:03
at 2006-05-01T22:03

By Annie
at 2006-05-03T13:22
at 2006-05-03T13:22

By Anthony
at 2006-05-04T03:04
at 2006-05-04T03:04

By Skylar DavisLinda
at 2006-05-07T16:06
at 2006-05-07T16:06

By Rebecca
at 2006-05-12T01:26
at 2006-05-12T01:26

By Ida
at 2006-05-16T03:53
at 2006-05-16T03:53

By Regina
at 2006-05-19T17:21
at 2006-05-19T17:21

By Dorothy
at 2006-05-22T15:45
at 2006-05-22T15:45

By Genevieve
at 2006-05-23T17:21
at 2006-05-23T17:21

By Kyle
at 2006-05-23T23:25
at 2006-05-23T23:25

By Brianna
at 2006-05-25T01:11
at 2006-05-25T01:11

By Carolina Franco
at 2006-05-26T14:26
at 2006-05-26T14:26

By Noah
at 2006-05-29T19:00
at 2006-05-29T19:00

By Faithe
at 2006-06-02T19:54
at 2006-06-02T19:54

By Olga
at 2006-06-07T12:26
at 2006-06-07T12:26

By Ingrid
at 2006-06-08T04:31
at 2006-06-08T04:31

By Emily
at 2006-06-10T01:08
at 2006-06-10T01:08

By Kumar
at 2006-06-13T08:05
at 2006-06-13T08:05

By Rachel
at 2006-06-15T23:06
at 2006-06-15T23:06
Related Posts
火盃的考驗!!!讚!!!

By Margaret
at 2005-11-20T00:32
at 2005-11-20T00:32
《AV》:正經惡搞、荒謬勵志

By Brianna
at 2005-11-14T10:53
at 2005-11-14T10:53
驅魔:尚待琢磨的紀實靈異

By Edward Lewis
at 2005-11-14T01:50
at 2005-11-14T01:50
誠意十足的寫實愛情電影【早熟】(雷)

By Andy
at 2005-11-13T20:49
at 2005-11-13T20:49
驅魔—事實是不容許懷疑的?

By Aaliyah
at 2005-11-12T22:47
at 2005-11-12T22:47