Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步? - 星際爭霸戰

By Frederica
at 2007-12-29T03:12
at 2007-12-29T03:12
Table of Contents
※ 引述《steed (......)》之銘言:
: 潛水潛到受不了,一起來戰一下
: 推 Yenchin:Q、Ancient 都會死得很難看
: ^^^^^^^^^^
: 推 Yenchin:Ancient 基本上就是科技很高的人類, 時空旅行才剛開發 12/25 16:49
: → Yenchin:昇格為 Ascended Beings 時間太晚, Time Lord 可以輕易抹 12/25 16:50
: → Yenchin:掉他們這段歷史 12/25 16:50
: → Yenchin:不考慮 Q 的偽神性, Q 的內戰影響只到幾顆星星爆掉 12/25 17:07
: → Yenchin:Time War 的影響是大規模星系時空的混亂 12/25 17:08
: STAR TREK TNG 6x06 TRUE_Q 中有提到一段Q的能力
: If this child does not know how to control her power she may
: accidently destroy herself or all of you , or perhaps your
: entire galaxy.
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: 這意味著Q並不是毫無節制的使用自己的能力,相反的 他們會在乎自己使用能力
: 會不會給低維度的生物帶來什麼影響。
: 一個Q族群中的小孩 就有能力隨手毀滅一個銀河系了 ,然後有人說Q會死的很慘?
我們有什麼義務相信 Q 在講實話? 就算他講得很誠肯好了,
他講 perhaps 我們有什麼義務把它當成 "sure" ?
此外整個 Trek 下來我們從來沒有看過 Q 展示過這樣的力量, 我們沒有
務去接受它, 小說中聽說有, 怪派拉蒙的政策吧
: 不知道有沒有人有印象,TNG中推月亮那集
: Q可是有能力改變宇宙萬有引力常數的存在啊。
沒有印象, 因為 Deja Q 那集他只是在旁邊叫 Geordi 改變引力
常數, 所以 Geordi 受到啟發用子空間的輕化效應把月球移走
所以同樣沒看過 Q 使出這種能力
: 其實要打帝國還是啥的,聯邦就夠了。帝國火力雖然很猛,但是打不到就沒有用
: TNG 7x12 Pegasus中的Phase Shift Cloaking device裝上去就有得打了吧。
: 不受任何阻礙的飛進去你的戰艦中,現形然後狂轟亂炸再隱形閃人
: 講的ST上至Q下至聯邦通通都是廢物一打就會秒殺的這種,這還滿讓人無言的..
而這個科技隨著羅幕倫人的要求被催毀, 要打什麼?
飛進戰艦時是虛的, 打出來的東西也是虛的, 要打什麼?
飛進戰艦時是虛的, 然後具現化在一艘內部構造密集的戰艦中還
能完整? 要打什麼?
戰力不足麻煩不要出來反串
--
People assume that time is a strict progression Ⅱ vworp~!
of cause to effect. But actually, from a non- ▅█▅ vworp~!
linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like 田田▌
a big ball of wibbly-wobbly...timey-wimey... ■■▌
stuff. ■■▌
_ ■■ _
--
: 潛水潛到受不了,一起來戰一下
: 推 Yenchin:Q、Ancient 都會死得很難看
: ^^^^^^^^^^
: 推 Yenchin:Ancient 基本上就是科技很高的人類, 時空旅行才剛開發 12/25 16:49
: → Yenchin:昇格為 Ascended Beings 時間太晚, Time Lord 可以輕易抹 12/25 16:50
: → Yenchin:掉他們這段歷史 12/25 16:50
: → Yenchin:不考慮 Q 的偽神性, Q 的內戰影響只到幾顆星星爆掉 12/25 17:07
: → Yenchin:Time War 的影響是大規模星系時空的混亂 12/25 17:08
: STAR TREK TNG 6x06 TRUE_Q 中有提到一段Q的能力
: If this child does not know how to control her power she may
: accidently destroy herself or all of you , or perhaps your
: entire galaxy.
: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
: 這意味著Q並不是毫無節制的使用自己的能力,相反的 他們會在乎自己使用能力
: 會不會給低維度的生物帶來什麼影響。
: 一個Q族群中的小孩 就有能力隨手毀滅一個銀河系了 ,然後有人說Q會死的很慘?
我們有什麼義務相信 Q 在講實話? 就算他講得很誠肯好了,
他講 perhaps 我們有什麼義務把它當成 "sure" ?
此外整個 Trek 下來我們從來沒有看過 Q 展示過這樣的力量, 我們沒有
務去接受它, 小說中聽說有, 怪派拉蒙的政策吧
: 不知道有沒有人有印象,TNG中推月亮那集
: Q可是有能力改變宇宙萬有引力常數的存在啊。
沒有印象, 因為 Deja Q 那集他只是在旁邊叫 Geordi 改變引力
常數, 所以 Geordi 受到啟發用子空間的輕化效應把月球移走
所以同樣沒看過 Q 使出這種能力
: 其實要打帝國還是啥的,聯邦就夠了。帝國火力雖然很猛,但是打不到就沒有用
: TNG 7x12 Pegasus中的Phase Shift Cloaking device裝上去就有得打了吧。
: 不受任何阻礙的飛進去你的戰艦中,現形然後狂轟亂炸再隱形閃人
: 講的ST上至Q下至聯邦通通都是廢物一打就會秒殺的這種,這還滿讓人無言的..
而這個科技隨著羅幕倫人的要求被催毀, 要打什麼?
飛進戰艦時是虛的, 打出來的東西也是虛的, 要打什麼?
飛進戰艦時是虛的, 然後具現化在一艘內部構造密集的戰艦中還
能完整? 要打什麼?
戰力不足麻煩不要出來反串
--
People assume that time is a strict progression Ⅱ vworp~!
of cause to effect. But actually, from a non- ▅█▅ vworp~!
linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like 田田▌
a big ball of wibbly-wobbly...timey-wimey... ■■▌
stuff. ■■▌
_ ■■ _
--
Tags:
星際爭霸戰
All Comments

By Dorothy
at 2008-01-01T03:11
at 2008-01-01T03:11

By Necoo
at 2008-01-05T15:33
at 2008-01-05T15:33

By Lauren
at 2008-01-08T11:19
at 2008-01-08T11:19

By Sarah
at 2008-01-12T02:23
at 2008-01-12T02:23

By Puput
at 2008-01-12T16:43
at 2008-01-12T16:43

By Ursula
at 2008-01-13T21:02
at 2008-01-13T21:02

By Iris
at 2008-01-15T01:00
at 2008-01-15T01:00

By Sarah
at 2008-01-16T09:10
at 2008-01-16T09:10

By Ingrid
at 2008-01-19T06:34
at 2008-01-19T06:34

By Bethany
at 2008-01-19T22:19
at 2008-01-19T22:19

By Dora
at 2008-01-20T22:58
at 2008-01-20T22:58

By Linda
at 2008-01-23T20:00
at 2008-01-23T20:00

By Carolina Franco
at 2008-01-27T07:41
at 2008-01-27T07:41

By Dora
at 2008-01-27T17:12
at 2008-01-27T17:12

By Madame
at 2008-01-28T13:44
at 2008-01-28T13:44

By Bethany
at 2008-02-01T16:56
at 2008-02-01T16:56

By Eartha
at 2008-02-03T04:01
at 2008-02-03T04:01

By Poppy
at 2008-02-07T15:00
at 2008-02-07T15:00

By Hamiltion
at 2008-02-09T09:48
at 2008-02-09T09:48

By Carol
at 2008-02-10T17:59
at 2008-02-10T17:59

By Eartha
at 2008-02-15T09:30
at 2008-02-15T09:30

By Ivy
at 2008-02-18T17:00
at 2008-02-18T17:00

By Carolina Franco
at 2008-02-21T17:32
at 2008-02-21T17:32

By Delia
at 2008-02-23T23:45
at 2008-02-23T23:45

By David
at 2008-02-27T12:05
at 2008-02-27T12:05

By Sandy
at 2008-03-01T08:46
at 2008-03-01T08:46

By Yuri
at 2008-03-02T07:15
at 2008-03-02T07:15

By Edith
at 2008-03-03T09:46
at 2008-03-03T09:46

By Thomas
at 2008-03-04T15:19
at 2008-03-04T15:19

By Ivy
at 2008-03-08T09:44
at 2008-03-08T09:44

By Susan
at 2008-03-12T09:46
at 2008-03-12T09:46

By Franklin
at 2008-03-14T19:42
at 2008-03-14T19:42

By Suhail Hany
at 2008-03-16T14:22
at 2008-03-16T14:22

By Gary
at 2008-03-17T05:30
at 2008-03-17T05:30

By Lydia
at 2008-03-17T18:49
at 2008-03-17T18:49

By Andrew
at 2008-03-20T22:03
at 2008-03-20T22:03

By Candice
at 2008-03-21T06:45
at 2008-03-21T06:45

By Sierra Rose
at 2008-03-26T02:05
at 2008-03-26T02:05

By Christine
at 2008-03-30T23:12
at 2008-03-30T23:12

By Daniel
at 2008-04-03T13:08
at 2008-04-03T13:08

By Linda
at 2008-04-06T20:19
at 2008-04-06T20:19

By Victoria
at 2008-04-10T11:05
at 2008-04-10T11:05

By William
at 2008-04-11T11:31
at 2008-04-11T11:31
Related Posts
請問現在哪裡找得到VOYAGER的影片呢?

By William
at 2007-12-28T13:35
at 2007-12-28T13:35
Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步?

By Vanessa
at 2007-12-28T10:16
at 2007-12-28T10:16
Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步?

By Faithe
at 2007-12-28T09:28
at 2007-12-28T09:28
Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步?

By Genevieve
at 2007-12-28T09:12
at 2007-12-28T09:12
Re: Star Trek與Star War 哪個科技較進步?

By Belly
at 2007-12-28T06:45
at 2007-12-28T06:45