※ 引述《alljerry04 (Jas)》之銘言：
: The Daily Beast 這兩天訪談了 Christopher Nolan
: 裡面有提到關於國內外大家討論得沸沸揚揚的科學問題、漏洞等等
: http://thebea.st/1GJtN5i
: 挑了其中相關的翻了一下，裡面還有其他訪問，關於霍華休斯傳的事情等等
: 感謝 qn123456 協助 XD
: 附上原文，如果有哪裡翻錯的話麻煩推文說一聲
: People online have been attempting to poke holes in the science of
: Interstellar. Do you find that literalness a bit silly? This is a movie, aft
er
: all.
: To be honest, I haven’t read whatever holes people are trying to poke so I
: can speak to the validity of it. My films are always held to a weirdly high
: standard for those issues that isn’t applied to everybody else’s films—
: which I’m fine with. People are always accusing my films of having plot
: holes, and I’m very aware of the plot holes in my films and very aware of
: when people spot them, but they generally don’t. But what were some science
: issues people had with the film? That was Kip’s domain.
: 老實說，我還沒讀過那些大家所試著找出來，打算讓我驗證真實與否的漏洞。我的電影
: 總是會有著其他電影沒有的高標準，不過我對此沒有意見，人們總是指責我的電影有著
: 漏洞，但是通常來說並沒有，我很注意我電影中的漏洞，而當人們發現的時候我也非常
: 注意。
: One thing I see being brought up is the time dilation on the planet that the
y
: land, where one hour equals seven years (or a factor of 60,000), and to get
: that time dilation you’d have to be literally skimming the surface of the
: black hole.
: Like “a basketball on the rim,” which is a phrase we use! That’s
: completely accurate, so there’s no hole there at all. Those issues are all
: buttoned-up, and Kip has a book on the science of the film about what’s
: real, and what’s speculation—because much of it is, of course, speculation
.
: There have been a bunch of knee-jerk tweets by people who’ve only seen the
: film once, but to really take on the science of the film, you’re going to
: need to sit down with the film for a bit and probably also read Kip’s book.
: I know where we cheated in the way you have to cheat in movies, and I’ve
: made Kip aware of those things.
: 就像是「籃球懸在籃框上一般」，這是我們使用的詞彙，這是正確無誤的，所以這個地
方
: 是沒有漏洞的。這些問題已經搞定了，Kip 有一本關於電影中的科學哪邊是真實的，哪
裡
: 又是推測的書，因為其中大多數，當然都是推測的。
: 現在有不少由那些只看過一次電影的人發的直覺性 tweets，但是如果你要認真探討片
中
: 的科學，你需要坐著看電影一會兒，或許同時讀一下 Kip 的書。
: 我知道有哪些地方是需要在電影中作弊的，而我有請 Kip 注意這點。
: Kip 的書 - 《The Science of Interstellar》
目前想到，最奇怪的就是座標問題。
防雷。。
男主是因為接受到鬼給的重力訊息，
才知道去nasa基地。
那，請問沒去之前，哪裡會知道那邊有nasa基地，
又要怎麼留下第一次的基地座標呢？
難道真的是命定？
就是會出現座標，
只是第一次命運中出現的座標，不是男主自己給的
有人有相同的疑問嗎？
--
Sent from my Android
--
: The Daily Beast 這兩天訪談了 Christopher Nolan
: 裡面有提到關於國內外大家討論得沸沸揚揚的科學問題、漏洞等等
: http://thebea.st/1GJtN5i
: 挑了其中相關的翻了一下，裡面還有其他訪問，關於霍華休斯傳的事情等等
: 感謝 qn123456 協助 XD
: 附上原文，如果有哪裡翻錯的話麻煩推文說一聲
: People online have been attempting to poke holes in the science of
: Interstellar. Do you find that literalness a bit silly? This is a movie, aft
er
: all.
: To be honest, I haven’t read whatever holes people are trying to poke so I
: can speak to the validity of it. My films are always held to a weirdly high
: standard for those issues that isn’t applied to everybody else’s films—
: which I’m fine with. People are always accusing my films of having plot
: holes, and I’m very aware of the plot holes in my films and very aware of
: when people spot them, but they generally don’t. But what were some science
: issues people had with the film? That was Kip’s domain.
: 老實說，我還沒讀過那些大家所試著找出來，打算讓我驗證真實與否的漏洞。我的電影
: 總是會有著其他電影沒有的高標準，不過我對此沒有意見，人們總是指責我的電影有著
: 漏洞，但是通常來說並沒有，我很注意我電影中的漏洞，而當人們發現的時候我也非常
: 注意。
: One thing I see being brought up is the time dilation on the planet that the
y
: land, where one hour equals seven years (or a factor of 60,000), and to get
: that time dilation you’d have to be literally skimming the surface of the
: black hole.
: Like “a basketball on the rim,” which is a phrase we use! That’s
: completely accurate, so there’s no hole there at all. Those issues are all
: buttoned-up, and Kip has a book on the science of the film about what’s
: real, and what’s speculation—because much of it is, of course, speculation
.
: There have been a bunch of knee-jerk tweets by people who’ve only seen the
: film once, but to really take on the science of the film, you’re going to
: need to sit down with the film for a bit and probably also read Kip’s book.
: I know where we cheated in the way you have to cheat in movies, and I’ve
: made Kip aware of those things.
: 就像是「籃球懸在籃框上一般」，這是我們使用的詞彙，這是正確無誤的，所以這個地
方
: 是沒有漏洞的。這些問題已經搞定了，Kip 有一本關於電影中的科學哪邊是真實的，哪
裡
: 又是推測的書，因為其中大多數，當然都是推測的。
: 現在有不少由那些只看過一次電影的人發的直覺性 tweets，但是如果你要認真探討片
中
: 的科學，你需要坐著看電影一會兒，或許同時讀一下 Kip 的書。
: 我知道有哪些地方是需要在電影中作弊的，而我有請 Kip 注意這點。
: Kip 的書 - 《The Science of Interstellar》
目前想到，最奇怪的就是座標問題。
防雷。。
男主是因為接受到鬼給的重力訊息，
才知道去nasa基地。
那，請問沒去之前，哪裡會知道那邊有nasa基地，
又要怎麼留下第一次的基地座標呢？
難道真的是命定？
就是會出現座標，
只是第一次命運中出現的座標，不是男主自己給的
有人有相同的疑問嗎？
--
Sent from my Android
--
All Comments