犀利的interview - 實境秀

如果大家有看過Carolyn的interview的話，會發現其實一般Task在BoardRoom裡面，

不是像剪接一樣只有十分鐘這樣短而已。


以下節錄自Carolyn接受NBC的訪問(貼在Season 3 的網站)

Question:
Carolyn, what has surprised you most about the female candidates on The
Apprentice? It seems they've evolved into more aggressive types as the show
has progressed. Would you agree?


Answer:
I've been told that I've come across a little harsher towards the women. I
don't think I've changed. I think the candidates have changed. It was
definitely a new breed [on Season 2] and I found them very different from the
first season's group. They were a little cutthroat and to a degree, that's
okay. But they seemed to concentrate more so on pointing fingers than on
actual facts.

I found [the season two] group a little more exhausting than the first group.
The first group had one- or two-hour boardrooms, now we seem to be going
three to five hours! I don't see too many people taking blame for errors
they've made. I hear a lot of long-winded comments and excuses. But I will
say, I think all the candidates as a whole are dynamic people. I think
they're strong people. I think they're very intelligent people. The
circumstances are tough. They have little sleep; they're in tight quarters.


供大家做參考，其實他們是很嚴謹在選人的，第二季甚至進行三到五個小時！

所以其實檯面下到底剪掉了多少的互動，我們也不清楚，說不定我們想過的解圍方法

Candidates都用過了。


所以大家不要對Candidates太失望啦 XD 畢竟每個都是從百萬個履歷表給挑出來的

等級呀～(不過我懷疑節目當局也是會故意挑一些相當戲劇性的角色來參與interviews)

※ 引述《lipse (High and Dry)》之銘言：
: 今天這集雖然主要的重點在最後Jen和Kelly的對決，
: 但之前的4位高階主管的interview也讓我大開眼界，
: 這幾位問到一些很犀利的問題，針對每位參賽者的表現，也都
: 能夠提出一針見血的的評論。
: 實在很佩服他們能在這麼短的時間，幾個問答中，就可以視出每位成員的特質，
: 也都針對企業界最需要的特點提出重要的問題，真不愧是頂尖業界的主管，
: 識人能力了得...
: 老實說，那些問題要我在不到一秒內回答出，還真困難...
: 看完影片中的interview，對我自己未來就業可能要面對的挑戰，
: 或interview時需要準備的幾個議題，有更清楚的方向!

--